Ninety percent of marriages fail. Much less the specific amount of separation for divorce. Just to see, however, can be seen signs of disaffection. Public are treated with indifference and even aggression. Hardly support after many years together. Such signs easily identifiable to anyone, as I respond to the fact that marriage is an unnatural institution. Supported by the most petty of the human condition.
joins other institutions artificial Content traumatic for the whole society. Like the Army, Industry, City, School, Churches. The state, in order. In the combination of these, it is understandable and even necessary. Because through marriage can be niches of resistance, allowing us to survive and even fight an aggressive environment.
alliances formed then are not about love, but, at best, on the willingness to combine two egos.
Their failure also reflects that of all other human institutions, among which is integrated. ***
Among animals of all species, usually not perceived strict limits as regards the exercise of sexuality. While some couples are stable properties, tend to interact, both females and males in a free.
Humans, as easily seen, tend tambiéna feel sexually attracted to many people throughout their lives. The difference with animals is that humans repress these impulses. Often such repression, exerted from the interior of the psyche, causing intense pain. And even disease.
interior not only from the limitation imposed painful sexual affection or even free. Every human society, even the most unbiased, "severely questioned the diversity of relationships. ***
The gaucho ahead on a horse. Hanging from his belt a weapon. Behind the woman, walking. Further back, the mules, with the rest of the luggage. Because more women-a mule-load of the luggage also. The only free and convenient, is the man. Proud, authoritarian, without consulting anyone decide the fate of his family. This is a portrait of thousands of situations throughout Argentina's history. To be continued repeating the vast territories of our nation. And surely in many parts of the world, not only in our continent.
One of the origins of marriage is in the male will have a woman for their sexual and domestic service.
This system was played for centuries not only by male power, but also by millions of women who formed the social system. Feeling partners of the organization established, generating a subordinate position but estimated in the wrong way, as safe and stable. ***
The prisoner number nine and they will confess.
is praying
cell with the prison priest. Because before dawn
in life have to remove. Because
killed his wife and a friend
unfair.
It says, to confess: I killed yessir
And if I am born again.
I will kill again.
.....
Number Nine was a very fair man.
I was on the night of grief
very happy to his hut.
But looking at
love in the arms of her rival. He felt
pain in his chest and could not be
endure. Father
I do not regret or I'm afraid of eternity.
I know that in heaven
the supreme being is to judge me.
Under the concepts of the awful song I grew up partially reproduced. I have heard it thousands of times, from childhood until today. The very Joan Baez, an intellectual pacifist, succumbed to the temptation to burn. His argument brings us to the core of the concept of family, ruling, even today, almost everywhere in the world. The idea that the other partner constitutes the basis of certain rituals and legal codes, an element of personal heritage. That is, a property private. As a result, since then (the time that was formally the relationship) has no right to even touch your skin, on pain of punishment.
The most horrific crimes are then, if not justification, at least striking trends to be "understood" by society. When committed under the glassy pattern of "violent emotion caused by the infidelity of the partner." Which is monstrous
contrary to a genuinely evolutionary ethics: can not kill anyone. For any reason. Except that we in turn attack to kill us, or kill someone else and respond to prevent it. And even this, with some considerations on these notes would be untimely. ***
The conception of property was and is undoubtedly the nerve center of the worst parent individual and collective suffering. Particularly in its Darwinian version. That is, that assists the strongest tacit right to use for their benefit all that exists on the planet. Including, of course, all other human beings.
At the personal level, it does not take much imagination to capture the atrocities that this conception leads. Every day we learn of thousands of murders on people for trying to "steal" something considered "property" of another. And many thousands of cases are occurring, probably without being known. Project
this conception of the couple, is to make a human being into a thing, immediately. Removing, therefore, its nature of being alive: for the essential quality of living is freedom. ***
nuances Religions usually have about marriage. But keep a thread that connects them: almost all are monogamous. The Mormons, one of the few modern communities who dared to practice polygamy, they were forced to join the system, imposed by the authorities. It should be noted however, that this custom was Mormon rather regressive tendencies (in culture). Since the right to polygamy was practiced only by men.
Among Christians, are cornerstones in favor of marriage and essential institutional few New Testament passages. However, I am not convinced they are genuine lessons taught by Jesus Christ. This is due to the following reasons:
a) Since the establishment of the four canonical Gospels, several investigators have found alterations and even artificial interpolations in the original writings.
The same inclusion, alongside them, the texts of Saul of Tarsus, a repressor of Christians, anyone who even knew Jesus, "shows the desire utilitarian pragmatism that guided the editors tasted ; licos the third century.
b) Both latíny then translations into various languages, were ordered by an institution that had separated almost completely from their original sources.
The emergence of new evangelical manuscripts (really old, some older than those used by the Catholic Church to make their translations), provides delicious items to deepen not only in this field but also in all aspects of the true philosophy that Jesus taught. Even
can infer some of these valuable manuscripts, the suggestion that Jesus Christ himself would have had a partner, he loved the public as such. ***
In short, I think that question is not monogamy itself, characterizing it as harmful. Even on my part, I am convinced that a stable partner is highly desirable, for someone who aspires to live in a rich and integrated with the rest of the cosmos. Only this team should be constituted on the absolute freedom and not coercion. Destinations on the unit and not real.
Clearly, despite our good intentions, such couples could only exist in a society without selfishness or meanness destructive killer. A society where each of its members feel responsible for the happiness of others, therefore, as for himself.
Source: http://www.juliocarreras.com.ar
